Abelson J, Wagner F, DeJean D et al. (2016) Public and patient involvement in Health Technology Assessment: A framework for action. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 32(4): 256–64
Berglas S, Jutai L, MacKean G et al. (2016) Patients’ perspectives can be integrated in health technology assessments: an exploratory analysis of CADTH Common Drug Review. Research Involvement and Engagement 2:21
Boivin A, Lehoux P, Burgers J et al. (2014) What are the key ingredients for effective public involvement in health care improvement and policy decisions? A randomized trial process evaluation. The Milbank Quarterly 92(2): 319–50
Bouvy JC, Cowie L, Lovett R et al. (2020) Use of patient preference studies in HTA decision making: a NICE Perspective. Patient13(2):145–9
CADTH (2019) CADTH Framework for Patient Engagement in Health Technology Assessment
Danner M and Gerber-Grote A (2017) Analytic hierarchy process. Chapter 11. In: Facey KM, Hansen HP, Single ANV, editors. Patient involvement in health technology assessment. Singapore: Springer Nature, p135–147
Egbrink MO, IJzerman M (2014) The value of quantitative patient preferences in regulatory benefit-risk assessment. Journal of Market Access & Health Policy 2
EUnetHTA (2016) HTA Core Model Online
EUnetHTA (2019) Patient input in relative effectiveness assessments
European Patients’ Forum (2013) Patient involvement in health technology assessment in Europe – results of the EPF survey. Brussels: EPF
Facey KM (2017) Developing the mosaic of patient participation in HTA. Chapter 5. In: Facey KM, Hansen HP, Single ANV, editors. Patient involvement in health technology assessment. Singapore: Springer Nature, p51–66
Facey KM, Bedlington N, Berglas S et al. (2018) Putting patients at the centre of healthcare: progress and challenges for health technology assessments. The Patient – Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 11(6): 581–9
Facey K, Boivin A, Gracia J et al. (2010) Patients’ perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 26(3): 334–40
Facey KM, Hansen HP, Single ANV, editors (2017) Patient involvement in health technology assessment. Singapore: Springer Nature
Garrido MV, Zentner A, Busse R (2008) Health systems, health policy and health technology assessment. Chapter 4. In: Garrido MV, Kristensen FB, Nielsen CP et al., editors. Health technology assessment and health policy-making in Europe. Observatory Study Series No. 14. Copenhagen: World Health Organization on behalf of European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, p53–78
Gauvin F-P, Abelson J, Lavis JN (2015) Evidence brief: strengthening public and patient engagement in health technology assessment in Ontario. Hamilton, Canada: McMaster Health Forum
Haefner S and Danner M. (2017) Germany. Chapter 25. In: Facey KM, Hansen HP, Single ANV, editors. Patient involvement in health technology assessment. Singapore: Springer Nature, p299–312
Hailey D (2005) Consumer involvement in health technology assessment. Alberta: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research HTA Unit
HTAi (2014) Values and Quality Standards for Patient Involvement in HTA (poster).
Kristensen FB and Sigmund H, editors (2007) Health technology assessment handbook. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish National Board of Health
Mason RJ, Searle KM, Bombard Y et al. (2020) Evaluation of the impact of patient involvement in health technology assessments: a scoping review. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 36(3): 217–23
Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) (1976) Development of medical technology – opportunities for assessment. Washington DC: United States Congress
OHTAC Public Engagement Subcommittee (2015) Public engagement for health technology assessment at Health Quality Ontario – final report from the Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee Public Engagement Subcommittee.
O’Rourke B, Oortwijn W, Schuller T, and the International Joint Task Group (2020) The new definition of health technology assessment: a milestone in international collaboration. Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 1–4
Silva AS, de Sousa MSA, da Silva EV et al. (2019) Social participation in the health technology incorporation process into Unified Health System. Revista de Saude Publica 53: 109
Single ANV, Facey KM, Livingstone H et al. (2019) Stories of patient involvement impact in health technology assessments: a discussion paper. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 35(4): 266–72
Street J, Stafinski T, Lopes E et al. (2020). Defining the role of the public in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and HTA-informed decision-making processes. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 36(2): 1–9
Staniszewska S and Werkӧ S (2017) Patient-based evidence in HTA. Chapter 4. In: Facey KM, Hansen HP, Single ANV, editors. Patient involvement in health technology assessment. Singapore: Springer Nature, p43–50
Swedish Council on HTA (2013) Evaluation and synthesis of studies using qualitative methods of analysis. Stockholm Sweden: Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU)
Vanstone M, Abelson J, Bidonde J et al. (2019) Ethical challenges related to patient involvement in health technology assessment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 35(4): 1–4
Werkӧ S and Andersson C (2017) Sweden. Chapter 28. In: Facey KM, Hansen HP, Single ANV, editors. Patient involvement in health technology assessment. Singapore: Springer Nature, p333–46