Home > Shared decision-making > References

Agoritsas T, Heen AF, Brandt L et al. (2015) Decision aids that really promote shared decision making: the pace quickens. BMJ 350: g7624

Allan GM, McCormack JP, Korownyk C et al. (2017) The future of guidelines: primary care focused, patient oriented, evidence based and simplified. Maturitas. 2017 95: 61–2

American Diabetes Association (2020) Guideline 2020: 6. Glycemic Targets: Standards of medical care in diabetes – 2020. Diabetes Care 43(Supplement 1): S66–S76

Andrews J, Guyatt G, Oxman AD et al. (2013) GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 66(7): 719–25

Bieber C, Gschwendtner K, Müller N et al. (2016) Partizipative entscheidungsfindung (PEF) – patient und arzt als team (Shared Decision Making [SDM] – Patient and Physician as a Team). Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie 66(5): 195–207

Bundesärztekammer (BÄK), Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV), Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF) (2019) Nationale versorgungsleitlinie chronische KHK – langfassung, 5. Auflage. Version 1. DOI: 10.6101/AZQ/000419

Bundesärztekammer (BÄK), Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV), Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF) (2021a) Nationale versorgungsleitlinie typ-2-diabetes – langfassung, 2. Auflage

Bundesärztekammer (BÄK), Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV), Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF) (2021b) Nationale versorgungsleitlinie typ-2-diabetes – leitlinienreport, 2. Auflage. Version 1

Carlsen B, Glenton C, Pope C (2007) Thou shalt versus thou shalt not: a meta-synthesis of GPs’ attitudes to clinical practice guidelines. British Journal of General Practice 57(545):971–8

Chou R, Qaseem A, Owens DK et al. (2011) Diagnostic Imaging for low back pain: advice for high-value health care from the American College of Physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine 2011 154(3): 181–9

Coylewright M, Branda M, Inselman JW et al. (2014) Impact of sociodemographic patient characteristics on the efficacy of decision AIDS: a patient-level meta-analysis of 7 randomized trials. Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 7(3): 360–7

Dobler C, Harb N, Maguire C A et al. (2018) Treatment burden should be included in clinical practice guidelines. BMJ 363: k4065

Dreesens D, Stiggelbout A, Agoritsas T et al. (2019) A conceptual framework for patient-directed knowledge tools to support patient-centred care: results from an evidence-informed consensus meeting. Patient Education and Counselling 102(10): 1898–904

Elwyn G, O’Connor A, Stacey D et al. and the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration (2006) Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ333(7565): 417

Elwyn G, Frosch D, Rollnick S (2009) Dual equipoise shared decision making: definitions for decision and behaviour support interventions. Implementation Science 4:75

Elwyn G, Wieringa S, Greenhalgh T (2016) Clinical encounters in the post-guidelines era. BMJ 353: i3200

Elwyn G, Durand MA, Song J et al. (2017) A three-talk model for shared decision making: multi-stage consultation process. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 2017 359: j4891

Elwyn G, Vermunt NPCA (2020) Goal-based shared decision-making: developing an integrated model. Journal of Patient Experience 7(5): 688–96

Fearns N, Kelly J, Callaghan M et al. (2016) What do patients and the public know about clinical practice guidelines and what do they want from them? A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research 16, 74

German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF) – Standing Guidelines Commission (2012) AWMF Guidance manual and rules for guideline development. 1st edition

German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) –Ad Hoc Commission on “Deciding Wisely Together” (2020) A manual on developing recommendations within the “Deciding Wisely Together” Initiative. Version 1.32020

German Network for Evidence-based Medicine (Deutsches Netzwerk Evidenzbasierte Medizin) (2015) Gute praxis gesundheitsinformation. Berlin: Deutsches Netzwerk Evidenzbasierte Medizin

Hong AS, Ross-Degnan D, Zhang F et al. (2017) Small decline in low-value back imaging associated with the ‘Choosing Wisely’ Campaign, 2012-14. Health Affairs (Millwood) 36(4): 671–9

Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines (2011) Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US)

Kühlein T, Schaefer C (2020) Die kunst des abweichens – the art of deviation. Deutsches Arzteblatt 117(37): A-1696 / B-1448

Légaré F, Hébert J, Goh L et al. (2016) Do choosing wisely tools meet criteria for patient decision aids? A descriptive analysis of patient materials. BMJ Open 6: e011918

Legaré F, Witteman HO (2013) Shared decision-making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice. Health Affairs (Millwood) 32(2): 276–84

Lühnen J, Albrecht M, Mühlhauser I et al. (2017) Leitlinie evi-denzbasierte gesundheitsinformation (English version) Hamburg: Leitlinie evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsinformation

Mackey TK, Liang BA (2011) The role of practice guidelines in medical malpractice litigation. Virtual Mentor 13(1): 36–41

Morgott M, Heinmüller S, Hueber S et al. (2019) Do guidelines help us to deviate from their recommendations when appropriate for the individual patient? A systematic survey of clinical practice guidelines. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 1–9

Nast A, Sporbeck B, Jacobs A et al. (2013) Study of perceptions of the extent to which guideline recommendations are binding – a survey of commonly used terminology. Deutsches Arzteblatt International 110(40): 663−8

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2012) Patient experience in adult NHS services: improving the experience of care for people using adult NHS services. NICE clinical guideline 138

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2015) Medicines optimisation: the safe and effective use of medicines to enable the best possible outcomes. NICE guideline 5

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2016) Multimorbidity: clinical assessment and management. NICE guideline 56

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2018a) Dementia: assessment, management and support of people living with dementia and their carers. NICE guideline 97

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2018b) Enteral (tube) feeding for people living with severe dementia

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2018c) NICE decision aids: process guide

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2019a) Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management. NICE guideline 123

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2019b) Surgery for stress urinary incontinence. Patient decision aid. NICE guideline 123

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2021a) Shared decision making. NICE guideline 197

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2021b) Shared decision making learning package

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2021c) Standards framework for shared-decision-making support tools, including patient decision aids. NICE corporate document 8

Ollenschläger G, Wirth T, Schwarz S et al. (2018) Unzureichende patientenbeteiligung an der leitlinienentwicklung in Deutschland – eine analyse der von der AWMF verbreiteten ärztlichen empfehlungen. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 135–136: 50–5

Parmar MS (2016) A systematic evaluation of factors contributing to overdiagnosis and over-treatment. Southern Medical Journal 109(4): 272–6

Pathirana T, Clark J, Moynihan R (2017) Mapping the drivers of overdiagnosis to potential solutions. BMJ 358: j3879

Schaefer C, Zowalla R, Wiesner M et al. (2015) Patientenleitlinien in der onkologie: zielsetzung, vorgehen und erste erfahrungen mit dem format. Zeitschrift Für Evidenz, Fortbildung Und Qualität Im Gesundhwesen 109(6): 455–51

Schwartz LM and Woloshin S (2013) The Drug Facts Box: Improving the communication of prescription drug information. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the Unites States of America 110(Suppl 3): 14069–74.

Schwarz S, Schaefer C, Schorr SG et al. (2019) Leitlinien im versorgungsalltag: ergebnisse einer evaluation im mixed-methods-design Düsseldorf. Berlin: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House

Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K et al. (2017) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 4(4):CD001431

Stacey D, Suwalska V, Boland L et al. (2019) Are patient decision aids used in clinical practice after rigorous evaluation? A survey of trial authors. Medical Decision Making 39(7): 805–15

Steckelberg A, Hülfenhaus C, Haastert B et aI. (2011) Effect of evidence based risk information on “informed choice” in colorectal cancer screening: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 342:d3193

Vader I, Krueger K, Drumm N et al. (2020) Nationale versorgungsleitlinien – wie bedeutsam sind konsensprozesse für die entwicklung von abbildungen und tabellen? Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House (Abstract) Doc20ebmPP6-07. doi: 10.3205/20ebm095

Van der Weijden T, Boivin A, Burgers J et al. (2012) Clinical practice guidelines and patient decision aids. An inevitable relationship. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 65(6): 584–9

Van der Weijden T, Pieterse AH, Koelewijn-van Loon MS et al. (2013) How can clinical practice guidelines be adapted to facilitate shared decision making? A qualitative key-informant study. BMJ Quality & Safety 22(10): 855–63

Van der Weijden T, Dreesens D, Faber MJ et al. (2019) Developing quality criteria for patient-directed knowledge tools related to clinical practice guidelines. A development and consensus study. Health Expectations 22(2): 201–8

Vandvik PO, Brandt L, Alonso-Coello P et al. (2013) Creating clinical practice guidelines we can trust, use, and share: a new era is imminent. Chest 144(2):381–9

Warner AS, Shah N, Morse A et al. (2016) Patient and physician attitudes toward low-value diagnostic tests. JAMA Internal Medicine 176(8):1219-21

Wegwarth O, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S et al. (2012) Do physicians understand cancer screening statistics? A national survey of primary care physicians in the United States. Annals of Internal Medicine 156(5): 340–9

World Health Organization (2001) International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) Geneva: WHO

Wyatt KD, Branda ME, Anderson RT et al. (2014) Peering into the black box: a meta-analysis of how clinicians use decision aids during clinical encounters. Implementation Science 9(): 26

Young CE, Boyle FM, Brooker KS et al. (2015) Incorporating patient preferences in the management of multiple long-term conditions: is this a role for clinical practice guidelines? Journal of Comorbidity 5: 122–31