Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ, Moberg J et al.(2016) GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction. BMJ 353: i2016
Ames HM, Glenton C, Lewin S (2017) Parents’ and informal caregivers’ views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2(2): Cd011787
Atkins S, Lewin S, Smith H et al. (2008) Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: lessons learnt. BMC Medical Research Methodology 8: 21
Chirenje ZM, Rusakaniko S, Akino V et al. (2001) A randomised clinical trial of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) versus cryotherapy in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 21(6): 617–21
Downe S, Finlayson KW, Lawrie TA et al. (2019) Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES) for Guidelines: Paper 1 – Using qualitative evidence synthesis to inform guideline scope and develop qualitative findings statements. Health Research Policy and Systems 17: 76
Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I, Zhang Y, Brundisini F et al. (2020) Patient values and preferences regarding VTE disease: a systematic review to inform American Society of Hematology guidelines. Blood Advances 4(5): 953–68
GagliardiAR, Brouwers MC, Palda VA et al. (2011) How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability. Implementation Science 6: 26
Gärtner FR, Portielje JE, Langendam M et al. (2019) Role of patient preferences in clinical practice guidelines: a multiple methods study using guidelines from oncology as a case. BMJ Open 9(12): e032483
GlentonC, Lewin S, Lawrie TA et al. (2019) Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES) for Guidelines: Paper 3 – Using qualitative evidence syntheses to develop implementation considerations and inform implementation processes. Health Research Policy and Systems 17: 74
Glenton C, Akama E and Tamrat T Web Supplement 2F: Factors influencing the acceptability, feasibility and implementation of interactive telemedicine: an overview of reviews (unpublished overview). In WHO (2019) WHO guideline: recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening. Web Supplement 2: Summary of findings and GRADE tables. Geneva: World Health Organization
Guidelines International Network and McMaster University (2014) GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist
Hao Q, Devji T, Zeraatkar D et al. (2019). Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a BMJ Rapid Recommendation. BMJ Open 20(9): e028777
Healthcare Improvement Scotland (2020) COVID-19 rapid evidence review. Managing the long-term effects of COVID-19: the views and experiences of patients, their families and carers
Hillis SD, Coles FB, Litchfield B et al. (1998) Doxycycline and azithromycin for prevention of chlamydial persistence or recurrence one month after treatment in women. A use-effectiveness study in public health settings. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 25(1): 5–11
Lane SJ, Sholapur NS, Yeung CH et al. (2016) Understanding stakeholder important outcomes and perceptions of equity, acceptability and feasibility of a care model for haemophilia management in the US: a qualitative study. Haemophilia 22 Suppl 3: 23–30
Lewin S, Booth A, Glenton C et al. (2018) Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series. Implementation Science 13: 2
Lewin S, Glenton C, Lawrie TA et al. (2019) Qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) for guidelines: Paper 2 – Using qualitative evidence synthesis findings to inform evidence-to-decision frameworks and recommendations. Health Research Policy Systems 17: 75
Guidelines International Network and McMaster University (2014) GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist
Morin SN, Djekic-Ivankovic M, Funnell L et al. (2020). Patient engagement in clinical guidelines development: input from > 1000 members of the Canadian Osteoporosis Patient Network. Osteoporos International 31: 867–74
Pai M, Key NS, Skinner M et al. (2016) NHF-McMaster Guideline on Care Models for Haemophilia Management. Haemophilia 22(S3): 6–16
Schünemann, HJ and Guyatt GH (2005) Commentary–goodbye M(C)ID! Hello MID, where do you come from?, Health Services Research 40: 593–7
WHO (2019a) WHO guideline: recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening. Geneva: World Health Organization
WHO (2019b) WHO guidelines for the use of thermal ablation for cervical pre-cancer lesions. Geneva: World Health Organization
Zhang Y, Alonso-Coello P, Guyatt GH et al. (2019a) GRADE guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences – risk of bias and indirectness. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 111: 94–104
Zhang Y, Coello PA, Brożek J et al. (2017) Using patient values and preferences to inform the importance of health outcomes in practice guideline development following the GRADE approach. Health Quality Life Outcomes 15: 52
Zhang Y, Coello PA, Guyatt GH et al. (2019b) GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences -inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 111: 83–93