Bayliss K, Starling B, Raza K et al. (2016) Patient involvement in a qualitative meta-synthesis: lessons learnt. Research Involvement and Engagement 2: 18
Bunn F, Sworn K, Brayne C et al. (2015)Contextualizing the findings of a systematic review on patient and carer experiences of dementia diagnosis and treatment: a qualitative study. Health Expectations 18(5): 740–53
Cochrane Community. Cochrane Review Ecosystem [online; accessed 4 December 2020]
Cochrane Consumer Network (2017) The Statement of Principles for Consumer Involvement in Cochrane
Concannon TW, Meissner P, Grunbaum JA et al. (2012) A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research. Journal of General Internal Medicine 27(8): 985–91
Concannon TW, Fuster M, Saunders T et al. (2014) A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research. Journal of General Internal Medicine 29(12): 1692–701
Edwards D, Evans N, Gillen E et al. (2015) What do we know about the risks for young people moving into, through and out of inpatient mental health care? Findings from an evidence synthesis. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health 9: 55
Harris J, Croot L, Thompson J et al. (2016) How stakeholder participation can contribute to systematic reviews of complex interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 70(2): 207–14
Hyde C, Dunn KM, Higginbottom A et al. (2017) Process and impact of patient involvement in a systematic review of shared decision making in primary care consultations. Health Expectations 20(2): 298–308
Liabo K (2013) Service user involvement in research: Collaborating on a systematic review with young people who have experience of being in care. Doctoral thesis. London: Institute of Education, University of London
Martin S, Fleming J, Cullum S et al. (2015) Exploring attitudes and preferences for dementia screening in Britain: contributions from carers and the general public. BMC Geriatrics 15: 110
Pollock A, Baer G, Campbell P et al. (2014) Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke. The Cochrane of Database Systematic Reviews 4: CD001920
Pollock A, Campbell P, Baer G et al. (2015) User involvement in a Cochrane systematic review: using structured methods to enhance the clinical relevance, usefulness and usability of a systematic review update. Systematic Reviews 4: 55
Pollock A, Campbell P, Struthers C et al. (2018) Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a scoping review. Systematic Reviews 7: 208
Pollock A, Campbell P, Struthers C et al. (2019) Development of the ACTIVE framework to describe stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 24(4): 245–55
Rees R, Kavanagh J, Burchett H et al. (2004) HIV health promotion and men who have sex with men (MSM): a systematic review of research relevant to the development and implementation of effective and appropriate interventions. EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London: London
Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I et al. (2017) GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ 358: j3453
Vale CL, Tierney JF, Spera N et al. (2012) Evaluation of patient involvement in a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data in cervical cancer treatment. Systematic Reviews 1: 23