GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence-publication bias.
- Overview
-
- Title:
- GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence-publication bias.
- Authors:
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Djulbegovic B, Atkins D, Falck-Ytter Y, Williams JW Jr, Meerpohl J, Norris SL, Akl EA, Schünemann HJ
- Journal:
- J Clin Epidemiol.
- Publication date:
- 2011 Jul 29
- Volume:
- Epub ahead of print
- Link to pubmed:
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21802904
- Publication type:
- Journal
- Abstract
- In the GRADE approach, randomized trials start as high-quality evidence and observational studies as low-quality evidence, but both can be rated down if a body of evidence is associated with a high risk of publication bias. Even when individual studies included in best-evidence summaries have a low risk of bias, publication bias can result in substantial overestimates of effect. Authors should suspect publication bias when available evidence comes from a number of small studies, most of which have been commercially funded. A number of approaches based on examination of the pattern of data are available to help assess publication bias. The most popular of these is the funnel plot; all, however, have substantial limitations. Publication bias is likely frequent, and caution in the face of early results, particularly with small sample size and number of events, is warranted.
- Preview
-
GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence-publication bias. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Jul 29; Epub ahead of print:.