Book Navigation

We are sorry, but signing in with LinkedIn is not possible at this time.


A G-I-N Cochrane Partnership Special Session

Presentation Title - "Research synthesis priorities and guideline development: Linking evidence synthesis production to evidence needs"

This Special Session will share, through a series of examples, strategies used to bridge this gap. Examples include technological developments that will speed up systematic review production; strategies that focus on building long-term relationships between guideline developers and systematic review groups; as well as targeted evidence synthesis products developed in response to specific needs.

  • Sep 14, 2017
  • 11:00 am
  • Cape Town
  • Ballroom West
  • 1:30 hours
  • Download

Guideline developers across the world and across health and clinical disciplines often find it challenging to obtain relevant evidence synthesis to produce guidelines in a timely/high quality manner. While some guideline developers maintain close relations with systematic review groups that can respond to their needs, others do not have these relations and rely on available evidence that often times does not respond exactly to their needs. Establishing inclusive priority setting processes, involving researchers, guideline developers, health care practitioners as well as consumers, is seen as one essential strategy to bridge the gap between evidence synthesis production and evidence synthesis needs.



  • Living systematic reviews (Anneliese Synnot) 
  • Cochrane Response/Targeted updates (Karla Soares-Weiser) 
  • ASH and McMaster collaboration (Holger Schünemann) 
  • Cochrane ENT and NICE (Martin Burton) 
  • Kaiser Permanente’s use of Cochrane/EPC systematic reviews (Craig Robbins)


Session objectives:

  • Present solutions for bridging the gap between evidence needs and evidence production.
  • Discuss these (and other) solutions and produce actionable suggestions for further decreasing this gap.



Sylvia De Haan

Marguerite Koster

Nancy Santesso


Target audience: 

Researchers, guideline developers and policy makers. Level: basic (no previous knowledge requested)


Type of session: 

Interactive; 4 to 5 oral inputs, followed by discussion about priority setting for evidence needs of guideline developers.

Page last updated: Aug 31, 2017
Back to top